Taylor Swift is taking proactive measures to safeguard her identity against the growing threat of artificial intelligence. On April 24, 2026, the artist filed new trademarks specifically targeting the unauthorized use of her voice and likeness, signaling a major escalation in how celebrities are navigating the digital landscape.
The filings include protections for her voice saying the phrases, “Hey, it’s Taylor” and “Hey, it’s Taylor Swift.” Additionally, her team secured a visual trademark for a specific image from her Eras Tour, featuring the singer in a bejeweled outfit while holding a pink guitar. These legal maneuvers represent a novel approach to AI-related intellectual property protection.
A New Frontier in Trademark Law
Trademark attorney Josh Gerben noted the significance of these filings, stating, “Attempting to register a celebrity’s spoken voice is a new use of trademark registration that has not been tested in court before.” While sound marks have existed for decades—such as the iconic NBC chimes—applying them to a human voice to prevent AI mimicry is uncharted territory.
Gerben suggests that these registrations could provide a powerful legal foundation for Swift. By establishing these specific sound marks, her legal team could argue that any AI-generated content that mimics her voice violates her trademark rights, even if the content is not an exact copy. “Trademark law doesn’t just stop identical uses (like copyright law): it stops anything that is confusingly similar to the registered trademark,” Gerben added. “That’s a much broader right and more powerful tool in an AI world.”
The Broader Industry Struggle
The move comes as the music industry grapples with the rapid advancement of generative AI. Intellectual property holders are increasingly concerned about how AI models utilize existing material to create new, unauthorized content. Major entities, including Disney, have already begun issuing cease-and-desist letters to tech companies like Google regarding the use of their intellectual property in AI training.
The music sector has seen similar friction. In late 2025, Jorja Smith and her label, FAMM, publicly addressed allegations that an electronic artist was using her voice to train AI vocals for a track. “The usage of efficacy of AI is growing at an alarming rate and substantially outpacing regulation,” the label stated, calling for clearer labeling and compensation for creators whose work is used to train these systems.
View this post on InstagramA post shared by FAMM (@famm.uk)
As the legal terrain remains murky, high-profile artists are looking to established legal frameworks to create a shield. Whether these trademark protections will hold up against the complexities of AI remains to be seen, but the industry is watching closely as one of the world’s biggest stars sets a new precedent for digital rights.
